Q. I got a new job in another city, and I have to report there in two weeks. That is certainly not enough time to fix up my current home to put it up for sale, much less find a buyer and close the sale. Would it be a good idea to rent the place out to cover my mortgage until I can get it spruced up and put it on the market?
A. I can understand your concern about paying the mortgage on your current home while you’re living somewhere else, but don’t make the decision to rent the place to tenants until you weigh all the pros and cons.
On the upside, the rental income the property would generate could indeed go a long way toward covering the mortgage payments, or might even provide a small profit. That’s a particularly important point to consider if sales in the area are slow and it could take several months to find a buyer.
Having a tenant in the property also would greatly reduce the chance that the home would be vandalized or even become the target of squatters — a fairly common problem that occurs when a house stands vacant for an extended period of time. You could even offer a lease-option contract, which would allow the tenant to initially rent the home and choose to buy it a pre-specified price at a later date — a move that would allow you to avoid the hassle of marketing the home to the public and the cost of hiring a real estate agent.
Now the drawbacks.
As I’ve written before, it’s hard to be a long-distance landlord. You won’t be around to check the property often or to make minor repairs, and hiring a property-management company to do such chores for you likely would be an expensive proposition.
Of course, there’s no guarantee that even the most carefully chosen renter won’t later become the “tenant from hell” who decides to trash the home or refuses to pay the rent.
And marketing a property that is occupied by tenants can be difficult, especially if they won’t cooperate with agents who want to tour the home with prospective buyers, or who don’t keep the place clean and in good repair.
If sales in your local market are strong and you have enough savings to cover at least two or three months of mortgage payments, I’d lean toward hiring a contractor now to make any needed repairs and cosmetic improvements right away and then put the vacant home up for sale with the help of a good real estate agent. But if sales are slow or you don’t have much cash, you may have no choice but to find a tenant and rent the property out until you eventually find a buyer.
Q. I bought my first home last year, so now I’m looking forward to saving lots of money through my new deductions for mortgage-interest payments and the like on my income-tax return. I received a form from the bank two weeks ago that shows I paid $4,918 in interest last year. But what’s to prevent me from claiming even more so I can get an even bigger tax refund?
A. If your own conscience won’t prevent you from lying on your tax return in an effort to boost your refund, perhaps an explanation of how the Internal Revenue Service collects data about your mortgage-interest write-offs — and the dangers of trying to inflate them — will persuade you to tell Uncle Sam the truth.
The notice you received from the bank is the government-mandated Form 1098, a copy of which you must attach to the tax return that you file by April 15. Lenders also file the information directly to the IRS’s massive computer system, which then automatically compares it with payments you claim on your return.
This system is nearly foolproof, and trying to beat it by intentionally inflating your interest charges almost surely would invite an IRS audit — not just of your interest charges and other real estate-related deductions, but perhaps even a line-by-line review of every other write-off you claim.
If the audit shows you purposely misrepresented your deductions or income, you will certainly get hit with hundreds — or even thousands — of dollars in penalties and fees, on top of the back-taxes you will owe. You could even go to jail for income-tax evasion.
Q. We are interested in buying a home that’s listed “for sale by owner.” Does mean we cannot make the offer through a real estate agent of our own?
A. No, you can make an offer through your own agent, even though the seller isn’t using one.
Some sellers choose the “for sale by owner route” because they don’t want to pay the typical 6 percent sales commission to a listing agent. However, they’ll often agree to pay a 3 percent commission to an agent who produces a buyer, in part because they don’t want salespeople to effectively boycott their property by refusing to show it to their clients.
REAL ESTATE TRIVIA
The German government has launched a program to sell about 150 large concrete bunkers, built by the Nazis during World War II, to real estate developers. Already, some have been converted into apartments and museums — even a disco.
Send questions to David Myers, P.O. Box 4405, Culver City, CA 90231-2960, and we’ll try to respond in a future column.More from columnist David W. Myers